Comments on: cameras of christmas past: the olympus e-1/2013/12/24/cameras-of-christmas-past-the-olympus-e-1/various and sundry notionsTue, 24 Dec 2013 19:47:24 +0000hourly1http://wordpress.com/By: whbeebe/2013/12/24/cameras-of-christmas-past-the-olympus-e-1/comment-page-1/#comment-17Tue, 24 Dec 2013 19:47:24 +0000/?p=41#comment-17In reply to atmtx.

The Kodak sensor does make a difference. All photos were shot in RAW (ORF) and post processed in Lightroom 3.x at the time. I once remarked that the release of Lightroom 3 breathed new life into the E-1’s raw files. As have further releases of LR 4 and LR 5.

Like

]]>
By: atmtx/2013/12/24/cameras-of-christmas-past-the-olympus-e-1/comment-page-1/#comment-14Tue, 24 Dec 2013 17:04:23 +0000/?p=41#comment-14The colors are really rich and spectacular. The look less digital in some ways.

I don’t usually asked these type of questions but wondering if the Kodak CCD sensor makes a difference. Did you post process? Where they shot in RAW or JPEG?

Like

]]>
By: Thomas Caverly/2013/12/24/cameras-of-christmas-past-the-olympus-e-1/comment-page-1/#comment-13Tue, 24 Dec 2013 15:07:20 +0000/?p=41#comment-13In reply to Thomas Caverly.

☆camera curmudgeons!

Like

]]>
By: Thomas Caverly/2013/12/24/cameras-of-christmas-past-the-olympus-e-1/comment-page-1/#comment-12Tue, 24 Dec 2013 15:06:03 +0000/?p=41#comment-12In reply to Thomas Caverly.

p.s. keep up the good work, Bill. Now my coffee time read is back to normal with VSL, TOP, and now ASL! Three old camers curmudgeons!

Like

]]>
By: Thomas Caverly/2013/12/24/cameras-of-christmas-past-the-olympus-e-1/comment-page-1/#comment-11Tue, 24 Dec 2013 14:58:11 +0000/?p=41#comment-11These photos are proof that bigger, better, faster….the great American obsession… is not always so.

Like

]]>