what time is it in london? daringfireball gets its knickers in a knot over the answer

Just about everybody and their sibling(s) knows who John Gruber is, and his blog, “DaringFireball” ( https://daringfireball.net/ ). In the past, before today, I’d regularly stroll by to read everything he posted. 99% of the time I’d nod my head in agreement with his opinions and observations and then move on to something else. Except for today.

Today, Gruber wrote ‘What Time Is It in London?’ ( https://daringfireball.net/2020/05/what_time_is_it_in_london ) in which he took Apple to task because Siri, when asked the question, supposedly took too long and then answered with the time in London, Canada.

Nilay Patel asked this of Siri on his Apple Watch. After too long of a wait, he got the correct answer — for London Canada. I tried on my iPhone and got the same result. Stupid and slow is heck of a combination.

So one of Gruber’s Twitter buddies tweets his experience asking the question, and Gruber gives it a try and finds the same issue. That’s fine as it goes. Except it gets much worse. In the next paragraph Gruber writes:

You can argue that giving the time in London Ontario isn’t wrong per se, but that’s nonsense. The right answer is the common sense answer. If you had a human assistant and asked them “What’s the time in London?” and they honestly thought the best way to answer that question was to give you the time for the nearest London, which happened to be in Ontario or Kentucky, you’d fire that assistant. You wouldn’t fire them for getting that one answer wrong, you’d fire them because that one wrong answer is emblematic of a serious cognitive deficiency that permeates everything they try to do. You’d never have hired them in the first place, really, because there’s no way a person this lacking in common sense would get through a job interview. You don’t have to be particularly smart or knowledgeable to assume that “London” means “London England”, you just have to not be stupid. (emphasis mine)

The stench of arrogance and entitlement that runs through this paragraph is so strong as to be unbelievable. It’s a good thing I never worked for John Gruber, because if I had and I’d done something, anything, that he deemed to be stupid and “emblematic of a serious cognitive deficiency” I’d have turned around and left far faster than he could have fire me. I would have, in effect, fired him as a boss. Who really wants to work for such a toxic individual?

If I’d run across this type of “problem”, I would have stopped and asked why that kind of result to the question. For software systems, that means letting someone know this is an issue and helping to resolve it. If it’s a person I stop and understand why they delivered that kind of answer. Who knows why? Taking something like this completely out of context and then rage-blogging about it only shows how immature the author (in this case one John Gruber) is. When it especially comes to people, I don’t believe in disposable people. I’m retired now, but I really have tried to be a mentor to those who’ve worked for me, not some bastard boss from hell.

I read that article early this morning while in my doctor’s office (many of us old retirees have Medical Issues that need looking into from time to time). I couldn’t try this in the waiting room, since a doctor’s waiting room, even during COVID-19, should be quiet. But when I got home around noon I tried it, and I got the “correct” answer. Later in the day I tried it again, and then this evening, before I wrote this post, I tried again and grabbed screen shots off my Apple Watch and iPhone. My hardware, in case you’re interested, is a Series 3 Apple Watch and an iPhone 11 Pro Max, both running the latest software that dropped yesterday.

Thanks, John, for helping me to cut my screen time down further. I now have more time to devote to what’s really important, helping others.

Series 3 Apple Watch, watchOS 6.2.5
iPhone 11 Pro Max, iOS 13.5

apple watch

You’re looking at the first generation Apple Watch I received for Christmas. This was a very big surprise from my wife. I spent part of Christmas day pairing the watch with my iPhone, and then watching it download Watch OS 2.1; that’s what the photo is about above.

So far I haven’t had any major quirks with the watch except for one, where I couldn’t modify the application layout with the Apple Watch app on my iPhone (see below).

Every time I went into App Layout I got a continuous busy spinning “fan”. I fixed that problem by going into General | Reset | Reset Home Screen Layout. Once that was done I then re-arranged some of the apps, which is the layout you see above.

If there’s an issue I have with the Watch it’s that it’s loaded with apps I don’t care about. That’s the same situation as with the iPhone itself. But on the iPhone I can at least drag unwanted apps into a folder which is labeled “Extras” on my iPhone (in fact, that folder was already there). There is no equivalent on the watch. Perhaps in some future Watch OS release you can at least turn off the unwanted apps. I doubt we’ll be able to remove them, just like you can’t remove those “Extra” apps.

Overall I’m satisfied with the watch, or at least, very enticed. I was going to avoid this version and wait for Apple Watch 2, or whatever the next version will be named. But the software has already gone through a number of upgrades, now at version 2.1, which is a lot considering how recently it was released. My first Apple gadget was an iPod Touch version 2 back in 2008, and considering where the Touch was at that point in time compared to the Watch, I’d have to say the Watch has more polish. Besides, it has the cachet of being the original, which I suppose makes it something of a collector’s item over time.

The latest Xcode has support for writing Watch apps, so I’m going to give that a whirl. Perhaps after 30 days or so I’ll write up a more detailed user’s review. I do know one thing, I will never call it a wearable. That is such a lame category. The first pocket watch, the first clock to be worn on the body, appeared in Europe in the 16th century. Eye glasses are another type of “wearable” technology, which appeared in Italy around the 13th century. This was the use of optics to help humans see better. These are two types of wearable technology that go back centuries. Modern tech is a refinement of these very early inventions, following the same physical conventions.