fedora 36 final arrives and i am not happy

Fedora 36 Final arrived late morning eastern standard time today, and I downloaded its ISO and installed it in a Parallels virtual machine. No issues at all installing it, and it quickly and easily configured. Two technical issues:

  1. Wayland still doesn’t work properly in a virtual machine on my MacBook Pro running macOS Monterey 12.3.1. I switched to regular old reliable Xorg at the login screen.
  2. I tried to build Parallels Tools and it failed to build and install. Specifically, the kernel driver it builds and installs failed to build. I’d hoped it would work because it worked for Fedora 35, which has the same kernel version, 5.17. But I guess not. I won’t even speculate why it’s broken, but it’s traceable to changes in the kernel sources. I’m sure that in fairly short order an update to Tools will arrive and it’ll build.

Those are VM issues, and not a concern for installing on bare hardware. I am, however, shocked, shocked I tell you, to find an example of someone else’s prudish sensibilities intruding into a distribution I’m seriously considering. See here in the Software application:

It’s called Parental Controls, it has a rating of 1.4 stars, and it deserves every down vote cast against it.

Since when did we need to have parental controls in the middle of a Linux distribution? If you want parental controls you can get plenty of that and more with Microsoft Windows. Have at it. If I wanted to stick Linux in front of a kid, I’d buy them a Chromebook. I have no idea who thought this was a Good Idea, but once again, they should be ejected from whatever specially committee they’re on, that committee in turn should be shut down, and this crap should be removed. I’m not even going to wait for someone to make it removable. I mean the purpose is for adult Linux users to impose their will on their children in such as blunt way? I’m not going to “control restrictions, control how long they can use the computer for, what software they can install, and what installed software they can run.” Fuck all of that. This may come as a shock to many, but the purpose of a parent is to be a parent, which means you devote whatever time and energy is necessary to be a good parent. You don’t buy them tech and then let the tech handle them. This is just utter bullshit. And yes, I checked, and it’s there on Fedora 35 at least. The party or parties responsible for this travesty even wrote in the release notes how they had to make the app uninstallable so that it wouldn’t remove “core desktop components,” which means it broke the graphical desktop. Reminds me of the brltty debacle with Pop!_OS.

Yeah. I thought I was going to install Fedora 36 in place of Pop!_OS, but that probably won’t happen. I’m now looking to choose between Ubuntu and Linux Mint. I know exactly what I’m getting with Ubuntu, whethere I stay with LTS or ride along with their six month releases. When I demand freedom in my operating system, I want it all. I don’t want to see any of this nanny-ware crap anywhere, I don’t care how widely your latest release is lauded.

It’s a good thing we still have choice.

fedora 36 final release pushed back to at least 10 may 2022

I read about this on Phoronix ( https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Fedora-36-May-10-Target ).

The gist of the article is that there are continuing blockers to a full release. Another check will be made on 5 May, and if necessary the full release will be pushed back beyond 10 May.

I’ve looked at the list of blockers ( see https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/milestone/36/final/buglist ), and there are only three I would consider high priority enough to block a full release; gnome-terminal, selinux-policy and wpa_supplicant. A forth blocker with NetworkManager-strongswan has to do with being unable to load the VPN editor for strongswan. Since I don’t use VPNs myself it’s of no concern to me, but it may be for others who are paranoid and want to run their traffic across a trusted VPN.

The other blockers are about Gnome photos. I couldn’t care less about Gnome photos. Even when it’s not buggy there are other, better alternatives. If it were my call to make I’d say fix the important networking/infrastructure bugs and ship a fix for Gnome photos on an update.

A question that immediately comes to my mind is why this bubbled up five days after it was written on Phoronix in search results on both Google and Duck Duck Go? None of the major Fedora sites such as Fedora Magazine and Get Fedora have made any mention of this, and still don’t. I didn’t catch it on Phoronix on 29 April because there is so much that’s published and I only visit about once a week, and thus it slipped by. This is yet another example of how search is essentially useless.

I’m still planning to switch to Fedora, but I may go ahead and switch to Fedora 35 and then upgrade to Fedora 36 later when it’s finally out. Fedora 35 already has all the current versions of the tools I use, including the latest kernel. And no brltty.